二要明確非《議定書》發(fā)達(dá)國家在《公約》下承擔(dān)與其他發(fā)達(dá)國家在《議定書》下可比的減排承諾。根據(jù)巴厘路線圖的要求，《議定書》發(fā)達(dá)國家在《議定書》下承擔(dān)減排指標(biāo)，非《議定書》發(fā)達(dá)國家也要在《公約》下承擔(dān)與之可比的減排努力，這種可比性包括了減排的性質(zhì)、范圍和遵約機(jī)制等。在此情況下，發(fā)展中國家也應(yīng)在可持續(xù)發(fā)展的框架下，在發(fā)達(dá)國家的資金和技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓支持下開展積極的減緩行動。很多發(fā)展中國家已經(jīng)提出了到2020年的自主減排行動目標(biāo)，在發(fā)達(dá)國家在《公約》和《議定書》第二承諾期分別承擔(dān)到2020年有國際法律約束力的減排指標(biāo)的情況下，可按照“共同但有區(qū)別的責(zé)任”原則，以適當(dāng)?shù)姆尚问矫鞔_發(fā)展中國家的減緩行動，認(rèn)可發(fā)展中國家的減排努力。

    三要細(xì)化并落實適應(yīng)、資金、技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓、能力建設(shè)方面的機(jī)制安排，細(xì)化體現(xiàn)發(fā)達(dá)國家和發(fā)展中國家區(qū)別的“三可”(可測量、可報告、可核實)和透明度的具體安排。目前大部分發(fā)展中國家都在力所能及的范圍內(nèi)采取了應(yīng)對氣候變化的積極行動，為應(yīng)對全球氣候變化作出了重要貢獻(xiàn)，但國際社會仍缺乏對發(fā)展中國家在資金和技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓方面的有效支持。只有建立有效機(jī)制并為發(fā)展中國家提供新的、額外的、充足的資金和技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓支持，發(fā)展中國家才能有效開展減緩行動和適應(yīng)行動?！犊怖f(xié)議》明確了有關(guān)“三可”和透明度的原則，中國支持在德班會議上就發(fā)達(dá)國家減排承諾及其對發(fā)展中國家資金、技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓和能力建設(shè)支持的“三可”和發(fā)展中國家自主減緩行動“國際磋商和分析”問題作出具體安排，這種安排也應(yīng)充分體現(xiàn)發(fā)達(dá)國家和發(fā)展中國家之間“共同但有區(qū)別的責(zé)任”原則。

Second, defining the emission reduction commitment under the UNFCCC for developed countries outside the protocol, which should be comparable with that of developed countries inside the protocol. Since developed countries inside the Kyoto Protocol have assumed their shares of emission reduction, developed countries out-side the protocol should also assume comparable emission reduction commitments under the UNFCCC, in accordance with the Bali Road Map. The commitment should be comparable in terms of the nature and scope of emission reduction, and the compliance mechanism. In such circumstances, developing countries should also actively reduce their emissions within the framework of sustainable development with funds and technological support from developed countries. Many developing countries have put forward their climate change mitigation plans by 2020. In accordance with the principle of "common but differentiated responsibilities," after developed countries assume their law-binding emission reduction targets under the UNFCCC and the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol, developing countries' similar targets should also be clarified in the form of law, and their efforts for emission reduction should also be recognized.

Third, specifying mechanisms and arrangements for adaptation, funding, technological transfer and capacity building, as well as measures to make the differences of emission reduction responsibilities transparent, measurable, reportable and verifiable between developed and developing countries. Most developing countries have taken active measures within their capacity to cope with climate change, and made important contributions. However, the international community still needs to provide effective support in a funds and technological transfer to developing countries. The latter will not be able to effectively carry out actions to mitigate and adapt to climate change without an effective mechanism, new, additional and abundant funds or technological transfer. The Cancun Accord specified the "measurable, reportable and verifiable" mechanisms and the principle of transparency. China maintains that specific arrangements should be made at the Durban conference regarding developed countries' emission reduction commitments, their support to developing countries in funds, technological transfer and capacity building, various "measurable, reportable and verifiable" responsibilities between developing and developed countries, as well as "international negotiation and analysis" of developing countries' voluntary climate change mitigation. The arrangements should also fully embody the principle of "common but differentiated responsibilities" between developing and developed countries.